Amy’s Newsletter

Share this post

The Smoking Gun Part 2

amysukwan.substack.com

The Smoking Gun Part 2

Amy Sukwan
Feb 27, 2022
Share this post

The Smoking Gun Part 2

amysukwan.substack.com

The news cycle has mostly turned to the Ukraine conflict, but as always I ask if that is a distraction. The Covid narrative and the safe and effective conjabs are not holding up. Quietly they would like to sweep this whole mess under the rug and set up a new play on stage. I'm still waiting for the 55,000 pages of Pfizer data to be released on March 1. 

My simple analysis is that these conjabs are the most deadly so called vaccines in history, very likely ineffective and probably counterproductive. There's an incoming train wreck coming from so many angles. I want the EUA rescinded and those in charge prosecuted. But how do you go about that? Gross negligence is allowed in the so called emergency, giving vaccine manufacturers a fig leaf cover, things were rushed and corners were cut because of the pandemic blah blah blah, but does it cover outright fraud? Here's the angles I've seen covered:

  1. Pfizer clinical trial fraud: the whistleblower. A lawsuit is making its way through the courts from a woman who worked at two clinical trial sites. She documented multiple unsafe trial practices, including vials not being stored at proper temperatures, used needles being left in the open, untrained staff, falsified records, and lack of follow-up on suspected adverse events. A write up was done here a few days ago. https://vaccineimpact.com/2022/pfizer-data-manipulation-the-dirty-details-of-the-fraud-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trials/

  2. Clinical trial fraud part 2: An interesting analysis was given by an unnamed biomedical researcher who read through Pfizer's initial EUA report as reported on the Naked Emperor's substack. I found this statement particularly troubling: "The first real red flag can be found in Table 2, page 18. There were 311 cases excluded for protocol deviations. only 60 placebos were excluded. Five times as many cases had been excluded. Those two numbers should have been the same. Why were five times as many cases excluded as controls for protocol deviation? I recall thinking at the time ‘What was the protocol deviation? Did they die?” If trial participants in the vaccine arm were excluded because they died, didn't answer the phone, or perhaps were unwilling to take the second dose due to an extreme adverse reaction to the first, then the safety of the jabs even in their own trials, which already had a higher death rate in the vaccine arm, could be skewed unacceptably high. Pfizer could literally be hiding the bodies by throwing the dead and injured out of the statistical analysis. Merck was accused of doing just that during Gardasil vaccine trials in India. 

  3. I have a related theory regarding the FDAs decision to not approve the Pfizer jab for the 6 month to 4 year age cohort until data on boosters can be accessed. I read that Pfizer was the one who withdrew the application, which I believe would keep all of the trial data out of the public eye. The toddler trial was undoubtedly very small just to keep rare adverse events from happening. But what if there was a death or two in the vaccine arm? The parents or concerned relatives would likely scream bloody murder if you tried to hide their child's body in this way. If the released data shows no deaths in the vaccine arm but you know that your child who was in the trial died shortly after the jab, wouldn't you go public with this? That could expose the blatant fraud in the trials. What do you think?

  4. Moving on from potential trial fraud, there is a theory that part of the genetic sequence of Moderna's vaccine was actually patented in 2018. Igor Chudov on substack has been covering this most extensively. It is possible that this was due to working with related sequence pairs, but this sequence is for cancer encoding. Could there be a benign or accidental reason for this being there?

  5. The bad batch or hot lot theory has been covered by me before. This one has been championed by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and his team and has the broadest chance of showing not just gross negligence, not just outright fraud, but pure crimes against humanity. In short an intentional dilution of most batches to be relatively benign while others (estimated at 1 in 200 doses) are extremely dangerous and deadly would constitute an experiment within an experiment with unknown nefarious purposes. Vaccine vials would need to be seized and independently analyzed as criminal evidence. A lot of people have chipped away at the bad batch theory from many angles, from high level statistical analysis to digging through legal contracts with Pfizer. The odds of adverse events and deaths being so disparately linked to some batches but not others is virtually impossible by chance alone. But could it be differences in manufacturing or storage?

  6. I think what might actually break through the wall is the drops in the bucket theory. In water parks I have been to with my children there is almost always a play area with a gigantic swinging bucket overhead which is slowly being filled with water. When the bucket reaches a critical mass it tips over, showering all of the kids below with water. With these conjabs we are all drops in that bucket. Almost everybody I know, myself included, knows at least one person whose death occurred a short time after getting a Covid jab, even though the death was almost never attributed to the vaccine. Even more people are coming forward about their own or family member's vaccine injuries. Many have been discarded by the medical care system that they put so much faith in and are told it's all in their head. They desperately need sympathy, compassion and answers, which opens up to questions. What are the mechanisms of harm in these products and how do you treat it? Why are some seemingly unaffected while others are devastated? Are there outside factors such as 5G deployment that might be interacting with the jabs in some way? Are the vaxxed shedding to the unjabbed, to what degree and under what circumstances? This is just a short list. Humanity needs to come together for humanities sake.

Do you think any of these avenues will be successful in stopping these jabs? As per Alex Berenson Covid vaccine demand is dropping off a cliff. Most have drawn their line in the sand. My feeling is that those who got the loot in this heist want it to go away for now, with all of their narrative intact for next time they want to roll it out. Let's not let that happen...

Share this post

The Smoking Gun Part 2

amysukwan.substack.com
Comments
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Amy Sukwan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing